同伴教育干预对小学生口腔健康知识、行为及龋齿的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-3110.2021.07.010

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (711 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨同伴教育干预方式对小学生口腔健康知识、行为及龋齿的影响,评估同伴教育干预对学生掌握口腔保健知识、形成正确口腔行为的效果。方法采用整群法抽取3所小学二年级学生395人,随机分成观察组和对照组,对照组学校常规宣教(老师或者医护人员授课),观察组学校常规宣教和同伴教育(口腔兴趣小组)结合,干预时间约1年。干预前后开展问卷调查、牙模刷牙和口腔检查。结果干预后,两组学生口腔知识和健康行为正确率均高于干预前(均P<0.001);除“最易发生龋齿牙齿”,干预后观察组其他问卷项正确率均明显高于对照组干预后的,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。干预后,观察组牙模刷牙合格率(82.51%)高于对照组(59.30%),差异有统计学意义(χ²=26.179, P<0.001),且均高于各组干预前水平(χ²=242.984,P<0.001; χ²=95.404,P<0.001)。干预前后两组乳牙患龋率和恒牙患龋率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后观察组乳龋充填率(42.99%)高于对照组(30.63%),恒龋充填率(59.57%)高于对照组(42.67%),差异均有统计学意义(χ²=15.493,P<0.001, χ²=4.778,P<0.05),且均高于各组干预前水平(P<0.001)。结论学校常规宣教和同伴教育结合方式能更大程度促进小学生掌握口腔保健知识、形成正确行为和提高龋齿充填率,同伴教育用于小学生口腔卫生宣教是有效可行的。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	吴根容
	杨炼辉
	黄海
	陈恩忠
	王伟炎
	曾素娟

关键词 ：同伴教育, 干预, 小学生, 龋齿, 口腔卫生

Abstract：Objective To explore the influence of peer education intervention (PEI) on oral health knowledge, behavior and dental caries among pupils, and to evaluate the effect of PEI on acquiring oral health knowledge and forming correct oral health behavior among them. Methods A cluster sampling method was used to select 395 pupils in grade 2 from 3 primary schools, and then they were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group. School routine education (teaching by teachers or medical staff) was carried out in the control group, while school routine education combined with peer education (oralinterest group) in the observation group. The intervention time was about 1 year. Questionnaire survey, brushing examination with dental models and oral examination were conducted before and after the intervention. Results The correct rates of oral knowledge and health behavior in the two groups after the intervention were improved compared with those before the intervention (both P<0.001). After the intervention, the correct rates of all the questionnaire items except the teeth most susceptible to decay were significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group (all P<0.05). After the intervention, the qualified rate of tooth-brushing with dental model was higher in the observation group than in the control group (82.51% vs. 59.30%), with a statistically significant difference (χ²=26.179, P<0.001); moreover, the qualified rates of the two groups after the intervention were both higher than those before the intervention (χ²=242.984, P<0.001; χ²=95.404, P<0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in the detection rates of caries in deciduous and permanent teeth in the two groups before and after the intervention (P>0.05). After the intervention, the filling rates of decayed deciduous and permanent teeth were higher in the observation group than in the control group (42.99% vs. 30.63%, 59.57% vs. 42.67%), with statistically significant differences (χ²=15.493, P<0.001, χ²=4.778, P<0.05); moreover, the filling rates of the two groups were all higher than those before the intervention (P<0.001). Conclusion School routine education combined with peer education can promote primary school students to master oral health knowledge, form correct behavior and improve the filling rate of dental caries. Peer education is effective and feasible in primary school students’ oral health education.

Key words： peer education intervention pupil dental caries oral health

收稿日期: 2021-01-21

R179

基金资助:广东省医学科学技术研究基金资助(项目编号:A2018480)

通讯作者: 曾素娟,E-mail:785327008@qq.com。

作者简介: 吴根容(1978- ),女,江西南城人,硕士研究生,副主任医师,主要从事公共卫生工作。

引用本文:

吴根容, 杨炼辉, 黄海, 陈恩忠, 王伟炎, 曾素娟. 同伴教育干预对小学生口腔健康知识、行为及龋齿的影响[J]. 实用预防医学, 2021, 28(7): 810-814. WU Gen-rong, YANG Lian-hui, HUANG Hai, CHEN En-zhong, WANG Wei-yan, ZENG Su-juan. Effect of peer education intervention on oral health knowledge and behavior and dental caries among primary school students. , 2021, 28(7): 810-814.

链接本文:

https://www.syyfyx.com/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-3110.2021.07.010 或 https://www.syyfyx.com/CN/Y2021/V28/I7/810

[1] Petersen PE.World Health Organization global policy for improvement of oral health--World Health Assembly 2007[J]. Int Dent J,2008,58(3):115-121.
[2] 卫生部卫生监督司,国家教委学校体育卫生司,全国爱国卫生委员会.全国学生常见病综合防治方案[Z]. 1992-09-01.
[3] Redmond AR, Martin N. Provision of school-based preventive oral health services to medicaid beneficiaries[J].Prev Chronic Dis,2006,3(1):A28.
[4] Nunn JH. The burden of oral ill health for children[J]. Arch Dis Child,2006, 91(3):251-253.
[5] 葛立宏.儿童口腔医学. 第5版 [M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2020:97.
[6] 刘菊华,曾素娟. 广州市小学生龋病现状及影响因素分析[J].中国学校卫生,2018,39(5):732-734.
[7] 宋秋坤,李智伟,李爱军,等.平顶山市8岁学龄儿童患龋状况及影响因素分析[J].实用预防医学,2019,26(1):74-77.
[8] 李菊红,张紫阳,胡潇文,等.深圳市12~15岁中学生恒牙患龋率及影响因素分析[J]. 预防医学,2020,32(10):1048-1050,1054.
[9] 邰昌松,陈小良,詹劲基,等. 深圳市光明新区小学生口腔疾病及口腔卫生知识知晓情况调查[J]. 实用预防医学,2012,19(11):1664-1666.
[10] 刘伟,林蓉,刘伟佳,等. 窝沟封闭预防儿童第一恒磨牙龋齿效果的meta分析[J].实用预防医学,2020,27(7):814-817.
[11] Ahovuo-Saloranta A,Forss H,Walsh T, et al.Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in permanent teeth[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2017,7:1830.
[12] 吴红英,王营营,王红美,等.不同干预方式对儿童口腔卫生知识及龋齿的影响[J].中国健康教育,2016,32(8):707-710.
[13] 武剑,阮世红,彭绩,等. 深圳市小学生口腔健康教育与健康促进效果分析[J]. 中国健康教育,2007,23(8):604-605.
[14] 柳键,荣文笙. 口腔健康调查基本方法第5版[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,2017:26-28.
[15] 国家卫生和计划生育委员会.第四次全国口腔健康流行病学调查结果发布[EB/OL].(2017-09-20)[2021-01-21]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-09/20/content_5226224.htm
[16] 黄少宏,李剑波,范卫华,等.广东省12~15岁人群恒牙龋病抽样调查报告(2015—2016年)[J].口腔疾病防治,2017,25(11):697-701.
[17] 周学东. 龋病学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:214-216.
[18] 卞金有.口腔预防医学[M].第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2001:30-211.
[19] 陈荣凯,钟苑芳,江海棠,等. 2011—2015年深圳市宝安区某街道中小学生龋齿现况调查[J]. 实用预防医学,2017,24(7):838-840.
[20] 刘菊华,郭仰峰,蔡伟丽,等. 小学生及家长口腔健康教育对学生知识行为近期效果评估[J].中国学校卫生,2020,41(3):425-427.
[21] 香富辉,陈爱兰,岑蔼儿. 朋辈教育对改善小学生口腔卫生知信行及卫生状况的效果分析[J]. 中国慢性病预防与控制,2019,27(2):111-114.
[22] 丁以标,刘红,李涌,等.小学生口腔卫生知识、态度和行为社区干预效果评价[J].职业与健康,2016,32(1):100-103.
[23] 杨岚,杨燕,谢晖,等. 广州部分初中生口腔健康教育效果评价[J]. 中国学校卫生,2013,34(4):402-404.
[24] 续美如. 龋病[J]. 中国学校卫生,2001,22(2):190-192.