2017年深圳市大气PM<sub>2.5</sub>污染状况及其来源解析研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-3110.2019.10.006

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (719 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨深圳市大气PM_2.5污染状况及其污染来源,为防治空气污染和保护人群健康提供参考依据。方法于2017年1－12月每月10－16日分别在深圳市南山区和龙岗区各设置一个监测点采集大气PM_2.5样品,分析样品PM_2.5质量浓度及PM_2.5中多环芳烃、重金属和水溶性离子含量,采用因子分析法对PM_2.5污染来源进行分析。结果研究期间南山区和龙岗区PM_2.5质量浓度中位数分别为0.041 mg/m³、0.039 mg/m³(Z=-0141,P=0.888),超标率分别为8.333%、7.143%(χ²=5.063,P=0.018)。因子分析法源解析发现:多环芳烃污染源为汽车尾气(南山区和龙岗区贡献率分别为49.986%、54.226%)、燃煤(南山区和龙岗区贡献率分别为16.936%、19.669%)和工业原料(南山区和龙岗区贡献率分别为9.270%、8.353%);水溶性离子污染源为汽车尾气、工业污染(贡献率为58.694%)和燃煤(贡献率为27.751%);重金属元素污染源为汽车尾气、工业冶金(南山区和龙岗区贡献率分别为55.993%、62.004%)和建筑尘(南山区和龙岗区贡献率分别为21.875%、11.051%)。结论 2017年深圳市大气PM_2.5污染较轻,其主要来源于汽车尾气、工业、燃煤尘的复合污染。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	严宙宁
	牟敬锋
	严燕
	余淑苑
	李斌

关键词 ： PM_2.5, 因子分析, 多环芳烃, 水溶性离子, 重金属

Abstract：Objective To explore the pollution status and source apportionment of PM_2.5 in Shenzhen city, and to provide a basis for air pollution abatement and health protection. Methods PM_2.5 samples of two monitoring sites in Nanshan district and Longgang district, Shenzhen city were collected on 10th-16th of every month from January to December 2017. PM_2.5 concentration and the content of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), heavy metals and water-soluble ions in PM_2.5 were measured, and the data were processed by factor analysis for the purpose of PM_2.5 source identification. Results The median concentration of PM_2.5 in Nanshan district and Longgang district was respectively 0.041 mg/m³ and 0.039 mg/m³ (Z=-0141, P=0.888), and the over-standard rates were respectively 8.333% and 7.143% (χ²=5.063, P=0.018 ). Source apportionment results derived from factor analysis showed that PAHs pollution sources were automobile exhaust (the contribution rates of Nanshan district and Longgang district were respectively 49.986% and 54.226%), coal combustion (the contribution rates of Nanshan district and Longgang district were respectively 16.936% and 19.669%) and industrial raw materials (the contribution rates of Nanshan district and Longgang district were respectively 9.270% and 8.353%). Water-soluble ion pollution sources were automobile exhaust, industrial pollution (the contribution rate was 58.694%) and coal combustion (the contribution rate was 27.751%). Heavy metal pollution sources were automobile exhaust, industrial metallurgy (the contribution rates of Nanshan district and Longgang district were respectively 55.993% and 62.004%) and construction dust (the contribution rates of Nanshan district and Longgang district were respectively 21.875% and 11.051%). Conclusions PM_2.5 pollution in Shenzhen city in 2017 was relatively light, and it was primarily derived from combined sources from automobile exhaust, industrial dusts and coal combustion.

Key words： PM_2.5 factor analysis polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon water soluble ion heavy metal

收稿日期: 2018-12-25

R122.7

基金资助:深圳市科技创新委员会科技计划项目(项目编号:JCYJ20170306103652632)

通讯作者: 牟敬锋,E-mail:30302m@163.com。

作者简介: 严宙宁(1971-),男,本科学历,副主任医师,研究方向:环境流行病学。

引用本文:

严宙宁, 牟敬锋, 严燕, 余淑苑, 李斌. 2017年深圳市大气PM_2.5污染状况及其来源解析研究[J]. 实用预防医学, 2019, 26(10): 1172-1176. YAN Zhou-ning, MOU Jing-feng, YAN Yan, YU Shu-yuan, LI Bin. Pollution status and source apportionment ofatmospheric particulates (PM_2.5) in Shenzhen city. , 2019, 26(10): 1172-1176.

链接本文:

https://www.syyfyx.com/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1006-3110.2019.10.006 或 https://www.syyfyx.com/CN/Y2019/V26/I10/1172

[1] 聂敏,任杰,杨光,等.PM_2.5大气污染对自由空间量子通信性能的影响[J].物理学报,2015,64(15):150301.
[2] Suades-González E,Gascon M,Guxens M,et al. Air pollution and neuropsychological development:a review of the latest evidence[J].Endocrinology,2015,156(10):3473-3482.
[3] Cohen AJ,Brauer M,Burnett R,et al .Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution:an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015[J].Lancet, 2017,389(10082):1907-1918.
[4] Wang X, Chow JC, Kohl SD, et al.Characterization of PM_2.5 and PM₁₀ fugitive dust source profiles in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region[J]. J Air Waste Manage, 2015,65(12):1421-1433.
[5] Watson JG, Chow JC, Lowenthal DH, et al.PM_2.5 source apportionment with organic markers in the Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization (SEARCH) study[J]. J Air Waste Manage, 2015,65(9):1104-1118.
[6] 杨财平, 明小燕, 杨小波.宜昌城区霾与非霾天气下PM_2.5中12种元素污染特征比较[J].实用预防医学,2019,26(2):180-182.
[7] 赵金镯,高知义,宋伟民.上海市区大气细颗粒物不同成分对血管内皮细胞的氧化损伤[J].环境与职业医学,2009,26(4):353-357,361.
[8] 高佳琦.深圳市大学城大气颗粒物(PM_2.5)污染特征分析及源解析[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2010.
[9] 杜金花,黄晓锋,何凌燕,等.深圳市大气PM_2.5中金属元素的污染和来源特征[C]//中国环境科学学会.PM_2.5监测及防治技术高级研讨会论文集.北京:中国环境科学出版社,2012:154-161.
[10] 李响.深圳PM_2.5的化学组成特征及来源解析[D].北京:北京大学,2011.
[11] 涂宏.南昌市城区PM_2.5的污染特征及其与儿童健康关系的研究[D].南昌:南昌大学,2016.
[12] 中华人民共和国水利部.SL 394.2-2007 铅镉钒磷等34种元素的测定-电感耦合等离子体质谱法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007:7-15.
[13] 深圳市生态环境局.2017年深圳市环境状况公报[R/OL].[2019-02-12].http://www.szhec.gov.cn/xxgk/tjsj/ndhjzkgb/.
[14] 环境保护部,国家质量监督检验检疫局.GB 3095-2012 环境空气质量标准[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2012:3.
[15] 赵晨曦,王云琦,王玉杰,等.北京地区冬春PM_2.5和PM10污染水平时空分布及其与气象条件的关系[J].环境科学,2014,35(2):418-427.
[16] 杨敏娟,沈惠平,黄云彪,等.上海市浦东新区PM_2.5污染水平及其主要成分的分布特征[J].环境与职业医学,2016,33(11):1026-1030.
[17] 黄亚林,刘超,曾克峰,等.2013－2014年武汉市PM_2.5的时空分布特征及其与气象条件的关系[J].生态环境学报,2015,24(8):1330-1335.
[18] 陈瑞,李拥军,杨海霞.2015年兰州市大气细颗粒物成分监测[J].环境与健康杂志,2017,34(3):231-233.
[19] 李玉武,刘咸德,李冰,等.绝对主因子分析法解析北京大气颗粒物中铅来源[J].环境科学,2008,29(12):3310-3318.
[20] Blifford IH,Meeker GO .A factor analysis model of large scale pollution[J].Atmos Environ,1967,1(1):147-158.
[21] 胡伟,魏复盛.中国4城市空气颗粒物元素的因子分析[J].中国环境监测,2003,19(3):39-41.
[22] 黄晓锋,云慧,宫照恒,等.深圳大气PM_2.5来源解析与二次有机气溶胶估算[J].中国科学:地球科学,2014,44(4):723-734.
[23] 徐昶.中国特大城市气溶胶的理化特性、来源及其形成机制[D].上海:复旦大学,2010.