Abstract：Objective To investigate the hygiene status of living drinking water and its influencing factors in schools in Liuyang City in 2016, and to provide references for formulating hygiene policy of living drinking water in schools. Methods We investigated the status of district distribution, types of water supply, ways of drinking water and drinking water hygiene protection in all schools in Liuyang City in October 2016, and then analyzed the current status of living drinking water hygiene and its influencing factors in schools based on the detection of the total number of colonies, coliform and heat-resistant coliform bacteria. Results The qualified rate of living drinking water in all schools in Liuyang City was 44.1%, and no statistically significant difference was found in the qualified rate among different types of schools(P>0.05). As for water supply ways, the coverage rates of schools with their own water supply system, schools with municipal water supply and schools with centralized water supply in rural areas were 60.36%, 13.17% and 40.94% respectively. The qualified rate was higher in municipal water supply (72.09%) and centralized water supply (61.37%) in rural areas than in self water supply (35.74%) (χ2=67.40, P=0.000). As for different ways of drinking water, the use rates of direct drinking water, bottled water and free boiling water were 15.86%, 13.11% and 65.70% respectively. The qualified rate was lower in free boiling water (7.55%) than in barreled water (49.25%) and direct drinking water (41.49%) (χ2=25.09, P=0.000). As for different types of water, the qualified rate was higher in well water (41.8%) and secondary water supply (100%)than in mountain spring water (13.68%) (χ2=32.24, P=0.000). As for hygiene protection measures, the hygiene and management system of school drinking water in Liuyang City was good (93.04%), but it was a mere formality and has many shortages in hygiene protection of sources of well water, secondary water supply, direct drinking water and barreled water. Conclusions The qualified rate of living drinking water in Liuyang City in 2016 was low. The important factors affecting the low quality rates of drinking water are insufficient hygiene protection of self-contained water sources, especially mountain spring water, and free boiling water
杨裔, 张红, 龙丽, 寻寒. 浏阳市2016年学校生活饮用水卫生现况及影响因素分析[J]. 实用预防医学, 2018, 25(10): 1202-1205.
YANG Yi, ZHANG Hong, LONG Li, XUN Han. Hygiene status of living drinking water and its influencing factors in schools in Liuyang City, 2016. , 2018, 25(10): 1202-1205.
[1] 夏倩. 浏阳市县域经济发展战略研究[D]. 长沙:中南林业科技大学,2013. [2] 李国钰. 探究农村生活饮用水和环境卫生与介水传染病的相关性[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2017, 17(28):183-187. [3] 吕萍萍,黄正,陶勇. 饮用水常规指示菌与介水传染病相关性研究[J]. 环境与健康杂志, 2017,34(3):225-258. [4] 蔡旭清,黄婷, 苏炳森. 腹泻便病原菌检验结果240例临床分析[J]. 当代医学, 2012, 18(1):30-31. [5] Fukz Z, Li J, Vemula S, et al. Effects of halobenzoquinone and haloacetic acid water disinfection byproducts on human neural stem cells[J]. J Environ Sci, 2017, 37(8):239-249. [6] Daiber EJ, Demarini DM, Ravuri SA, et al. Progressive increase in disinfection byproducts and mutagenicity from source to tap to swimming pool and spa water: impact of human inputs[J]. Environ Sci Technol, 2016, 50(13):6652-6662. [7] Hang C, Zhang B, Gong T, et al. Occurrence and health risk assessment of halogenated disinfection byproducts in indoor swimming pool water[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2016, 543(Pt A):425-431. [8] 陈利民,张夏虹,左素俊,等. 突发急性传染病防控策略探讨[J]. 实用预防医学, 2017,24(2):255-257. [9] 葛嫦娥. 大同市农村学校饮用水卫生状况调查[J]. 基层医学论坛, 2016, 20(15):2100-2101.
2018, Vol. 25 
