Evaluation on the health risk of trichloromethane in living drinking water in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, 2021
YUE Xuanzhi1, FAN Ruichun2, LI Huan1, YIN Minghui3, WU Duoduo4, ZHANG Wenyu1, JIA Xinrui1, QIN Yuhan1,3, FAN Yaochun1,3
1. Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 010059, China; 2. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital/Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Children's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 010020, China; 3. Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 010080, China; 4. Baotou Medical College, Baotou, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 014040, China
Abstract：Objective To monitor the concentration of trichloromethane in living drinking water in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in 2021, and to assess its health risk level. Methods We monitored the concentration of trichloromethane in living drinking water in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in 2021. A risk assessment model was used to appraise the risk of trichloromethane concentration through three exposure pathways, namely, oral intake, percutaneous penetration and respiratory intake. Results The concentration ranges of trichloromethane in living drinking water in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in 2021 were ND-0.0592 mg/L, with a qualified rate of 100.00% and a detection rate being 13.24%. The carcinogenic risks of urban water through oral intake, percutaneous penetration and respiratory intake were 7.88×10-7, 6.61×10-8 and 8.59×10-8 respectively, with the cumulative carcinogenic risk level being 8.03×10-7. The carcinogenic risks of rural water through the above-mentioned three exposure pathways were 4.36×10-7, 1.85×10-8 and 1.08×10-8 respectively, with the cumulative carcinogenic risk level of 4.39×10-7. The carcinogenic risk levels of urban and rural water were both less than 10-6, remaining within the acceptable range. The concentration of trichloromethane was higher in rural water than in urban water as well as higher in wet season than in dryseason. As for different types of water samples, the concentration of trichloromethane in secondary supply water was the highest, followed by tip water and out-factory water, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion The health risk level of trichloromethane in living drinking water in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in 2021 was within an acceptable range. The concentration of trichloromethane in some regions is close to the limit recommended by Hygienic Standards for Drinking Water, and this issue should be noted by the local relative department. The concentration of trichloromethane can significantly increase in water supply networks, and monitoring and management of local water supply networks should be strengthened.
岳宣志, 范瑞春, 李欢, 殷明辉, 武多多, 张雯宇, 贾芯芮, 秦钰涵, 范耀春. 2021年内蒙古自治区生活饮用水中三氯甲烷健康风险评估[J]. 实用预防医学, 2024, 31(2): 156-158.
YUE Xuanzhi, FAN Ruichun, LI Huan, YIN Minghui, WU Duoduo, ZHANG Wenyu, JIA Xinrui, QIN Yuhan, FAN Yaochun. Evaluation on the health risk of trichloromethane in living drinking water in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, 2021. , 2024, 31(2): 156-158.
[1] 王雪娇,陈越英,王晓蕾,等. 次氯酸钠对生活饮用水消毒效果与影响因素研究[J].中国消毒学杂志,2020,37(12):881-883. [2] Pereira MA, Lin LH, Lippitt JM, et al. Trihalomethanes as initiators and promoters of carcinogenesis[J]. Environ Health Persp,1982,46:151-156. [3] Villanueva CM, Espinosa A, Gracia-Lavedan E, et al. Exposure to widespread drinking water chemicals, blood inflammation markers, and colorectal cancer[J]. Environ Int,2021,157:106873. [4] Rehman ZU,Rasheed HM,Bashir K,et al. UHPLC-MS/MS-GNPS based phytochemical investigation of Dryopteris ramosa (Hope) C. Chr. and evaluation of cytotoxicity against liver and prostate cancer cell lines[J]. Heliyon,2022,8(11):e11286. [5] International Agency for Research on Cancer. Agents classified by the IARC monographs, volumes 1-129[EB/OL].(2022-08-12)[2023-03-26].http://monographs.iarc.fr/agents-classified-by-the-iarc. [6] 顾鸿儒,罗斌,蒋松. 2018—2021年太仓市饮用水三氯甲烷浓度分布及风险评估[J].现代预防医学,2022,49(16):3051-3055,3062. [7] 中华人民共和国卫生部.生活饮用水标准检验方法 消毒副产物指标:GB/T 5750.10-2006[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006:1. [8] 国家卫生健康委员会. 化学物质环境健康风险评估技术指南:WS/T 777-2021 [S].北京:中国标准出版社,2021:1-13. [9] 中华人民共和国环境保护部. 中国人群暴露参数手册(成人卷)[M].北京:中国环境出版社,2013:87,575. [10] 中华人民共和国卫生部. 生活饮用水卫生标准:GB 5749-2006[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006:3. [11] 聂宏骞,赖宣丞,易长文,等. 海南省农村生活饮用水三氯甲烷、四氯化碳含量调查及健康风险评价[J].中国热带医学,2022,22(6):555-559. [12] 周立娇,张怡然,魏振彦,等. 预氧化消毒方式对三卤甲烷控制的生产性试验[J].中国给水排水,2021,37(13):65-69,76. [13] 潘璐,王炳玲,王寅,等. 2014—2019年青岛市生活饮用水健康风险评估[J].山东大学学报,2021,59(12):42-49,57. [14] 贾茹,郑晶利,孙茜,等. 陕西省生活饮用水中10种污染物的健康风险评价[J].职业与健康,2022,38(22):3092-3096. [15] 赵桂鹏,邹柯婷,徐清,等. 西安市市政供水三氯甲烷分布特征及多途径暴露健康风险评估[J].现代预防医学,2023,50(4):611-617. [16] 王冰,张永,盛欣. 北京市政供水中三氯甲烷和四氯化碳含量分析及健康风险评估[J].环境卫生学杂志,2022,12(1):51-55. [17] 于天一,刘晓波,杨继鹏,等. 哈尔滨市市政供水中三氯甲烷和四氯化碳含量及健康风险评估[J].职业与健康,2022,38(16):2243-2246. [18] 尹艳, 董淑江, 陈萍. 2019—2021年句容市生活饮用水水质监测结果分析[J].实用预防医学,2023,30(3):359-361. [19] 徐小燕,刘玉红,赵红军,等. 双水源对置供水管网中三卤甲烷变化规律浅析[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(1):47-52.
2024, Vol. 31 
