SF-12量表用于城市建筑业农民工生存质量的信度和效度研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (198 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的分析SF-12量表用于评价城市建筑业农民工人群生存质量的信度和效度。方法采用内部一致性信度评估SF-12量表的信度,采用集合效度、区分效度和结构效度评估SF-12量表的效度。结果SF-12量表评价城市建筑业农民工人群的内部一致性信度Cronbach’s α系数为0.776,8个维度的集合效度定标试验成功率为100%,区分效度定标试验成功率为100%;对量表的理论模型进行验证性因子分析,所得模型与原始假定一致,拟合指标结果为RMSEA=0.052,NFI=0.973,CFI=0.982,AGFI=0.964。结论SF-12量表适用于城市建筑业农民工群体的生存质量评价。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李晓文
	吴彤
	刘洋
	张冰冰
	刘嵘

关键词 ： SF-12, 信度, 效度, 生存质量, 城市建筑业农民工

Abstract：ObjectiveTo access the reliability and validity of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) applied in assessing the quality of life of rural migrants working in construction sites in cities. MethodsReliability of the SF-12 was evaluated by internal consistency reliability, and validity was evaluated by convergent validity, discriminant validity and structure validity. ResultsThe internal consistency, indicated by Cronbach's α coefficient, was 0.776. The success rates of convergent validity experiment and discriminant validity experiments of 8 dimensions were all 100%. The structure validity test by confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the model was consistent with the theoretical assumption, and the fitness indexes were RMSEA=0.052, NFI=0.973, CFI=0.982, and AGFI=0.964. ConclusionsSF-12 is applicable for assessing the quality of life of rural migrants working in construction sites in cities.

Key words： SF-12 Reliability Validity Quality of life Rural migrants working in construction sites in cities

通讯作者: 刘嵘,liurong@mail.cmu.edu.cn

作者简介: 李晓文（1989-）,男,河南人,汉族,硕士在读

引用本文:

李晓文,吴彤,刘洋,张冰冰,刘嵘. SF-12量表用于城市建筑业农民工生存质量的信度和效度研究[J]. 实用预防医学, 2015, 22(5): 520-522. LI Xiao-wen, WU Tong, LIU Yang, ZHANG Bing-bing, LIU Rong. Reliability and validity of SF-12 applied in assessing the quality of life of rural migrants working in construction sites in cities. , 2015, 22(5): 520-522.

链接本文:

https://www.syyfyx.com/CN/ 或 https://www.syyfyx.com/CN/Y2015/V22/I5/520

[1] World Health Organization. The development of the WHO quality of life assessment instrument [R]. Geneva: WHO, 1993.
[2] 肖惠敏,邝惠容.SF-12量表评价中国老年人生存质量的信度和效度分析[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,2(34):1018-1020.
[3] 尚煜,王国飞,闫承生.SF-12量表评价儿童生命质量信度和效度分析[J].中国妇幼卫生杂志,2011,2(3):115-9.
[4] 张莎,田晋,刘巧兰,等.流动人口SF-12生命质量量表信度、效度评价[J].中国公共卫生,2011,27(2):226-227.
[5] 廖贵蓉,裴小琴,秦莎莎,等.SF-12量表用于评价地震灾区居民生存质量的信度、效度分析[J].现代预防医学,2010,37(5):883-5.
[6] 石景容,邓玲,陆丽明.中山市中小型家具制造业外来务工人员心理健康现状分析[J].职业与健康,2013,29(10):1153-1156.
[7] 李宁秀,刘丹萍,刘朝杰,等.成都市城市居民SF-12评价研究[J].四川大学学报（医学版）,2010,41(6):1044-1046.
[8] 陶建华,洪燕,浙江省绍兴市603名农民工职业卫生知识认知及需求调查[J].中国健康教育,2012,28(11):967-968.
[9] 李鲁,王红妹,沈毅.SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J].中华预防医学杂志,2002,36(2):109-113.
[10] Ware JE,Kosinski M,Keller SD.How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales[M]. Boston, Massachusetts: The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, 1995.
[11] Ware JE,Kosinski M,Keller SD.A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity[J]. Med Care,1996,34(3):220-233.
[12] Lam CL,Tse EY,Gandek B.Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population [J].Qual Life Res,2005,14(2):539-547.
[13] 陈晶,于冰琰,魏敏,等.第二代亚健康调查表信度与效度评价[J].中国公共卫生,2009,25(1):37-38.
[14] 崔明,刘嵘,刘皓,等.沈阳市建筑业弄民工心理状况分析[J].中华预防医学杂志,2014,48(4):330-332.
[15] 崔明,刘嵘,刘皓,等.沈阳建筑工地民工生命质量及影响因素研究[J].实用预防医学,2014,21(6):645-648.
[16] 刘洁,何钦成.建筑工地民工生命质量及影响因素分析[J].实用预防医学,2013,20(2):157-159.
[17] 吴明隆.结构方程模型—AMOS的操作与应用[M].重庆大学出版社,2009.